Write an essay of at least 900 words (3 pages) in which you discuss one aspect of our border policy. Use and establish a representative example from “Hole in the Fence”, “Hold the Line”, or “What Remains.” Use the techniques from Writing Analytically in order to generate your significant details from the text and your interpretation of them. Your approach should be analytical. A successful essay will establish a representative example from the text and examine the significance and implications of the idea/thesis that you are developing while making your thesis evolve. It is important to focus and go deeper on one aspect of example or topic.
Your essay should have the following requirements:
- an analytical approach
- a representative example from the reading that you are analyzing
- an evolving thesis that results from examining complicating evidence
- MLA format and citation of sources
Respond to the two drafts assigned to you later when I submit the essay.
I need to follow the peer review process, including instructions for providing feedback to other two drafts.
I’m in USA currently so USA border policy will work.
I think we can use examples from those three podcasts or any other resources.
It is essential to cite and connect the essay.
I can send you the previous work if you want to see it as a reference.
Since we were young, we are engulfed by sex lore. It is still in dialogue, laughter, and confrontation, and everything from driving types to food tastes must be clarified. Sex is so deeply incorporated into our structures, behavior, values, and expectations that it seems inherently familiar to us. The environment has several theories about gender – and these concepts are so prevalent that we take it for granted that they are valid. As analysts, scientists, and historians, though, it is our task not only to discover the facts behind it but also to glance over what seems to be a common cause. Just since gender appears to be expected, and gender values tend to be simple realities, we ought to step back and look at gender from a different viewpoint. To achieve this, we need to interrupt our routines, which is comfortable and to challenge sure of our core convictions. This is not simple because gender is so fundamental to our view of ourselves and the universe that it’s hard to reverse and reverse.Look at things in a different light. However, the idea that the analysis of gender is apparent renders it fascinating precisely. Gender appears obviously, it brings the task of uncovering the building mechanism that causes what we have always believed to be expected and unforgivable to explore sex, not as a predetermined object, but as an achievement (Gumperz, 2012).
The mass media and the scholarly study on language and identity demonstrate the implications of not understanding this problem. As a consequence, individual gender bonds enhance and facilitate current convictions to achieve others (Jordan, 2010). Biological variations between men and women are widely claimed to define gender by triggering permanent discrepancies in capacities and dispositions. Higher testosterone levels, for example, contribute to men becoming more violent than women; and the Left-Brain’s superiority causes males to be more rational, and women should become more emotional because of their more significant lack of brain lateralization. The interaction between physiology and actions is not simple, though, and gender dichotomies are far too quick to sail. And the physiology itself is more complicated than average. It is a product of multiple behaviors and a source of hormone levels, brain-behavior habits, and brain morphology. A study with rhesus monkeys and fish species have shown shifts in hormones induced by social changes. In its early phases, the research on sexual variations in the brain remains far from definitive.
The smaller corpus callosum of males, bigger amygdala, giant premaxillary nucleus, and debatable anatomical discrepancies that account for sex variations from the more extraordinary visually-spatial ability of males to the propensity to gaze at the breast. Much of the famous work on gender disparities in the brain is focused on weak research and is generally exaggerating what occurs in empirical literature and distortions. And very few tests, mostly from imperfect or wounded groups, are focused on research literature itself. Moreover, the similarities between brain function and comport ability or cognition are not so well understood – thus, scientists may try or identify the implications of individual physiological variations. More specifically, the brain is somewhat plastic and evolves as a result of practice (Grafman, 2011).
The concern is not whether there are biological variations related to sex that might influence stuff like prevailing cognitive types. The position in the social and scientific practice of such study is a problem. Sexuality is the subject of techniques, as all inquiries and answers are sometimes mixed with unanalyzed cultural assumptions as flimsy proof of biological diversity. And the findings are transmitted via the most august media as if the mapping of the human genome is their science standing. To make the condition much worse, the usage of fancy equipment such as fMRI also offers the road to scientific rigor centered on insignificantly thin, unprotected samples. Speaking about the genome, it is noticed that several of those findings were spurious in their analysis of detailed study into sex-related variations in genetic influences in traits and prevalent diseases. More than half of the associations between genes and sex observed had not been statistically meaningful before the value was identified, and even the most robust results were seldom funded. Researches state that sex variations are a famous goal in genetic experiments because sex is one category listed in any genetic sample, rendering statistical tests convenient and straightforward.
Actual discrepancies between men and women appear to be more scalable than dichotomous, with both women and men occupying the same amount. Take our voices into account. The men’s vocal tracts are on average longer than those of women, providing a lower speech pitch. But the natural voice tone of people in culture does not merely follow the vocal tract measurements. When the age of quatre or five years is finished, male and female vocal tracts are separated before adolescence, boys and girls may actively and implicitly distinguish their tones, while boys increase their voice pitch (Goffman, 2016).
Gender should not flow from our bodies spontaneously and explicitly to when it is connected to biology. The genes, hormones, genitalia, and secondary sex properties of the organism do not decide the profession, gait, or color terms. And, while male habits of superficial behavior limit the option of hairdo among adults, many men can play a pageboy or a beehive as quickly as many wives. Gender is precisely the method of constructing a dichotomy, removing correlations, and elaborating on discrepancies, which are amplified and broadened in the interest of identity-building where biological differences arise. The organization is exceedingly intrigued by women’s breast size today, as breast augmentation procedure is now readily accessible.