Bus 311 week 1 dq 1

  

Ashford 2: – Week 1 – Discussion 1

 

Your initial discussion thread is due on Day 3 (Thursday) and you have until Day 7 (Monday) to respond to your classmates. Your grade will reflect both the quality of your initial post and the depth of your responses. Reference the Discussion Forum Grading Rubric for guidance on how your discussion will be evaluated.

 

     

Applying   the Law to a Set of Facts

 

Read the Hypothetical Case Problem #1 at the end of Chapter 1 and respond to these questions:
 

1.    If Javier sued Energy-Auto Inc., identify who would be the plaintiff and the defendant.
2.    In which state or states can the suit be brought?
3.    Assume that Javier incurred $100,000 in damages.
 

a)    Analyze whether the suit can be brought in federal court
b)    Explain the advantages and disadvantages of federal versus state court for this type of suit.
 

Guided Response: Analyze and respond to at least two of your classmates’ postings. Do you agree with their conclusions? Did the facts you considered important in determining jurisdiction differ from your classmates?  Explain why or why not.  

Ashford 2: – Week 1 – Discussion 1

 

Your initial discussion thread is due on Day 3 (Thursday) and you have until Day 7 (Monday) to respond to your classmates. Your grade will reflect both the quality of your initial post and the depth of your responses. Reference the Discussion Forum Grading Rubric for guidance on how your discussion will be evaluated.

 

     

Applying   the Law to a Set of Facts

 

Read the Hypothetical Case Problem #1 at the end of Chapter 1 and respond to these questions:
 

1.    If Javier sued Energy-Auto Inc., identify who would be the plaintiff and the defendant.
2.    In which state or states can the suit be brought?
3.    Assume that Javier incurred $100,000 in damages.
 

a)    Analyze whether the suit can be brought in federal court
b)    Explain the advantages and disadvantages of federal versus state court for this type of suit.
 

Guided Response: Analyze and respond to at least two of your classmates’ postings. Do you agree with their conclusions? Did the facts you considered important in determining jurisdiction differ from your classmates?  Explain why or why not.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes:

<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>